Dehehantong Law Offices

On November 19, 2025, The Legal 500, an internationally renowned legal rating agency, released the 2026 Asia-Pacific Greater China ranking list. Dehehantong Law Firm was selected for The 2026 The Legal 500 list of notable law firms in the Greater China region of the Asia-Pacific region in Shanghai. Meanwhile, the labor employment field of Dehehantong was nominated as a notable area for Chinese-funded law firms in this list. Lawyers Jiang Chun and Zhang Hengtong, founding partners of Dehehantong, Lawyer Qiu Wenyu, director of the Shanghai Management Committee of Dehehantong, lawyers Hou Jie, Guo Xianhao and Bai Fangrong, managing partners of the Shanghai office, and partner Zhang Jianing have been nominated as recommended lawyers for the Shanghai region.

Recently, Dehehantong Law Firm, with its outstanding professional capabilities and rich practical experience, successfully entered the database of Guosen Securities Co., Ltd. and provided legal services for litigation disputes for it. This entry into the database was led by Senior Partner Wei Feng and Partner Lu Weipeng of the Shanghai office of Dehehantong.

In the previous articles, we have systematically interpreted several common investor priorities, including the right of first refusal, the right of joint sale, the right of first refusal, the right of first refusal, the right of anti-dilution, the right of liquidation priority, and the right of first refusal. This article will further focus on the right of first dividend and the right of first refusal, which, although not universally applicable, are of great significance in specific transactions. And deeply analyze the underlying logic and key points of the negotiation.

This article takes the case of selling counterfeit registered trademarked goods represented by Chen Shilei, a senior partner of the Shanghai office of Dehehantong, and Ma Keting, a lawyer from the Shanghai office, as an example to focus on analyzing the impact of changes in the amount involved in the audit report in cases of selling counterfeit registered trademarked goods on defense.