Lawyer Dehehantong successfully defended the smuggling of common goods

In the balance of law, the combination of justice and wisdom can achieve the best result for the parties. Sun Yunkang, a lawyer from the Shanghai office of Dehe Hantong, demonstrated the professional defense ability of Dehe Hantong's legal team in a recent case of smuggling of general goods. Defendant Li Moumou is accused of introducing and assisting suspected criminal units to carry out smuggling activities under the false name of diplomatic tax exemption, involving tax evasion of up to tens of millions of yuan. In the face of complex cases, lawyer Sun Yunkang took a series of professional defense measures.

Course of defense

01, the innocence defense of the Sun lawyer in the review of the prosecution stage accepted the commission of Li Mou, after in-depth analysis of the case file materials, that the investigation organ on Li mou's allegations of insufficient evidence, to the prosecution submitted a legal opinion. Subsequently, the prosecution indictment changed Li Mou from the original criminal unit supervisor to a joint crime between natural persons and units, and the amount of personal tax evasion was more than one million yuan.

02, the opening of the court debate In the trial, Sun lawyer against the prosecution's charges, from the subjective intent of Li Mou and objective behavior of two aspects, to construct the argument of innocence.

03, insufficient evidence to demonstrate Lawyer Sun pointed out that the evidence based on the indictment can not really prove that Li Mou has the subjective intention of smuggling. At the same time, the evidence of specific involvement in smuggling is also insufficient.

04, strategic compromise After fully assessing the risk of litigation, Li Mou chose to plead guilty in order to fight for a more favorable verdict. Sun had a frank communication with the court, and finally the court accepted the defense's opinion and made a verdict of conviction and exemption from punishment.

Analysis of points of defence

By analyzing the interrogation transcripts, self-confessions, and the testimony of co-defendants and witnesses, Lawyer Sun argued that Li had no subjective intention to smuggle.

In response to the allegations of joint smuggling in the indictment, Lawyer Sun pointed out that there was insufficient evidence to prove that Li had participated in smuggling.

For the key documentary evidence, Lawyer Sun raised doubts about its authenticity, because these evidence is partly from foreign criminal suspects, and the testimony of the embassy staff is inconsistent with the reply letter of the embassy.

Conclusion

Through this case, Sun Yunkang once again demonstrated his professional strength and rigorous attitude in the field of criminal defense. Dehe Hanthong Law Firm will continue to take the interests of clients as the core, provide comprehensive and professional legal services, and strive for the maximum legitimate rights and interests of clients. The road to justice may be full of challenges, but under the professional escort of Dehohanthong's legal team, every client can obtain due legal protection.